Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 17012

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : June | Volume : 17 | Issue : 6 | Page : EC10 - EC14 Full Version

Comparison of Cord Blood pH, Haematological Parameters and APGAR Score of New-Born with Maternal and Peri-Natal Risk Factors: A Prospective Observational Study


Published: June 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60987.18067
Meenakshi Mahadevan, Vijayashree Raghavan, Geethapriya Govindarajan, Divyasree Prakash

1. Postgraduate, Department of Pathology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor, Department of Pathology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Student, Department of Pathology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Geethapriya Govindarajan,
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kanchipuram District, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Kelambakkam, Chennai-603103, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: geethgovindarajan@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration (APGAR) score is used worldwide to assess newborn health immediately after birth. The combination of pH analysis, haematological parameters of cord blood samples and APGAR score compared with the maternal and peri-natal risk factors will help us identify the cause of low APGAR.

Aim: To compare the pH of cord blood, haematological parameters, Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and APGAR score with high-risk maternal and peri-natal factors.

Materials and Methods: This is a prospective observational study, conducted over a period of six months, at Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chennai. The cord blood samples of 40 newborns (20 normal and 20 high-risk pregnancy) were collected for assessing pH and haematological parameters (complete haemogram, nucleated Red Blood Cells (RBCs), reticulocyte count). APGAR scores were obtained from clinical records. The data obtained in the study was analysed using the International Business Management (IBM) Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) statistics version 23.0.

Results: The authors compared 20 cases of newborns with maternal risk-factors with 20 newborns with no risk factors, and found that low APGAR and acidic pH of cord blood, high NLR was associated with risk factors present in the ante-natal and peri-natal period.

Conclusion: The present study observed that a low APGAR, low acidic pH of cord blood, high NLR was seen in mothers with adverse risk factors during pregnancy, compared to the mothers with no associated co-morbidities. Hence, the presence of risk-factors during pregnancy should warrant a close follow-up of the new-born in the immediate postpartum period.

Keywords

Appearance pulse grimace activity and respiration score, Assessment, Haemogram

Foetal hypoxia can occur anytime during the course of pregnancy. Regular ante-natal check-up and foetal monitoring is required to assess foetal health. Electronic foetal monitoring is used to screen foetal distress during pregnancy and labour (1). Foetal mortality continues to be high in our country despite the recent advances in maternal and foetal care. The main cause of death during the early neo-natal period is peri-natal hypoxia. Prolonged low-oxygen saturation can result in hypoxic ischaemic brain damage and in severe cases can also lead to cerebral palsy. There are several maternal and foetal risk factors that can lead to neo-natal hypoxia, some of which include intra-uterine meconium aspiration, injury during birth, certain infections (2).

The APGAR score was originally developed in the mid-nineties as a tool to assess neo-natal health and as an aid for appropriate measures to be taken in case of neo-natal hypoxia. The score also helps the physician evaluate the requirement for resuscitation and chances of neo-natal survival. APGAR score is calculated at the end of one minute and five minutes. It includes five parameters: heart rate, respiration, muscle tone, reflexes, and colour. Each of these factors is given a score of 0, 1 or 2 which sums up to a total of 10 (3).

Apart from assessing the APGAR score, the pH of cord blood can also be used as an indicator of neo-natal distress. The normal umbilical cord pH is >7.2. A pH of less than seven is considered low, and is labelled as neo-natal acidaemia and is associated with neo-natal complications (1). Haematological parameters including RBC, White Blood Cells (WBC) and platelet counts, Haemoglobin (Hb), Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH), Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC), Red-cell Distribution Width (RDW), Reticulocyte count and nRBCs can also be evaluated to assess neo-natal health.

The maternal and intra-natal risk factors are additionally studied, apart from neo-natal cord blood pH, haematological parameters and APGAR scores. This was done to predict neo-natal outcome by correlating these values and to exercise high caution and practice early ICU admission when there are associated risk factors along with low APGAR, cord blood pH and a high NLR.

Material and Methods

The present study is a prospective observational study which was conducted over a period of six months from March 2022 to August 2022 at Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. Consent was obtained from the mothers before collecting the cord blood samples and clinical details.

Human Ethics Committee clearance was obtained (Proposal number: 508/IHEC/3-19).

Inclusion criteria: All term infants born via normal vaginal/instrument assisted delivery, irrespective of their gravid status were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Infants born through caesarean section, preterm infants, still-born infants, infants for whom clinical details were not available were excluded from the study. Caesarean section cases were not included in this study.

Sample size calculation: Population size (for finite population correction factor or fpc)(N): 100000. Hypothesised % frequency of outcome factor in the population (p): 6.6%±5. Confidence limits as % of 100, (absolute±%)(d): 5% Design effect (for cluster surveys-DEFF): 1

Sample size ‘n’={DEFF*Np(1-p)}/{(d2/Z21-a/2*(N-1)+p*(1-p)}
Sample size=41, as Result from OpenEpi

In the present study, the authors included 40 cases who were in their third trimester of pregnancy (37 weeks) expecting to have a normal vaginal delivery. They were separated into two groups based on the presence and absence of maternal and peri-natal risk factors. They were categorised as normal pregnancies and high-risk pregnancies. Each group contained 20 members. Advanced maternal age, maternal obesity, instrumental delivery, meconium-stained liquor, pregestational diabetes mellitus, prolonged rupture of membranes, pregnancy induced hypertension and urinary tract infection during pregnancy were the risk factors under consideration and those that did not have any of these conditions were taken under the no-risk factor category.

Study Procedure

Immediately after the delivery of the new-born, the umbilical cord was clamped and the sample was collected in a pre-heparinised 5 mL syringe to calculate pH values using automated blood gas analyser. An Ethylene Diamine Tetra-acetic Acid (EDTA) sample was also collected to assess haematological parameters in the cord blood. The pH of the cord blood was calculated by assessing Arterial Blood Gas (ABG). The normal umbilical cord pH is 7.2 and a pH of less than seven is associated with increased incidence of cerebral palsy (1). In this study, pH of less than seven was considered low umbilical cord pH. APGAR scores were collected from the paediatrician’s register for 20 cases with risk factors and 20 cases without risk factors. APGAR stands for Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration. It is scored out of a ten with each score ranging from 0-2.

Appearance: Normal colour overall with pink colour of the hands and feet is scored 2, normal colour but bluish hands and feet is scored 1 and bluish or pale all over is scored 0.

Pulse: Is scored 2 if it’s over a 100 bpm; 1, if it is below 100 bpm and 0 if there’s no pulse.

Grimace: Scored 2 if the new-born pulls away, sneezes or coughs on stimulation; 1 if there is only facial movement with stimulation and 0 if there is no response to stimulation.

Activity: Scored 2 if there is active movement; 1 if there is less movement and 0 if there is no movement.

Respiration: Scored 2 when there is a normal effort and good cry; 1 with slow, irregular breathing and a weak cry; 0 if there is no breathing (4).

The cord blood sample was run in our automated haematology analyser to obtain complete blood count values. In order to calculate the reticulocyte count and nucleated RBCs, blood smears were taken and stained with Leishman stain and Methylene blue were done.

History was obtained regarding the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus before pregnancy and also the values of blood sugars during pregnancy for all the mothers. Gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed based on a plasma glucose of >200 mg/dL after a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (5). The authors also procured the blood pressure values of all the expecting mothers. Pregnancy induced hypertension was diagnosed when the systolic BP was more than 140 and diastolic BP was more than 90 (6). The age and the weight, including the Body Mass Index (BMI) were also included in the data record. Maternal age of more than or equal to 35 was considered advanced maternal age (7). Body mass index of overweight individuals, between 25 and 29.9 was associated with increased complications during pregnancy and the same cut-off is considered in this study (8). The mode of delivery and the presence or absence of foetal distress during delivery along with the use of any instruments was also documented. Any infection/Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) during pregnancy was taken into account. With these relevant clinical details obtained from the subjects, the authors were able to categorise them as low-risk or high-risk.

Infants requiring Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission and oxygen support along with the number of days in NICU were documented. After collecting data, all the parameters of low-risk and high-risk pregnancies were compared along with the one minute and five minute APGAR scores. Total score ranges from 0 to 10, a higher score indicating the better physical condition of the baby. Scores that are lower than seven could indicate foetal distress and is associated with an increased chance of foetal demise in the early neo-natal period (3).

Statistical Analysis

The data obtained in the study was analysed using the IBM SPSS statistics version 23 for data analysis.

Results

In the present study, the authors have 20 cases with known maternal and foetal risk-factors, which are compared with the haematological parameters (RBC, WBC and platelet counts, Hb, Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH), Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC), Red cell Distribution Width (RDW), Reticulocyte count and nRBCs), APGAR score and cord-blood pH. The other 20 cases were infants born without any associated or known risk-factors. All of them were delivered by normal vaginal delivery with or without use of instruments. The risk factors that were seen in 20 cases were, UTI during pregnancy, pregnancy induced hypertension, pregestational diabetes mellitus, meconium-stained liquor, prolonged rupture of membranes, advanced maternal age of >35 years, maternal obesity and instrument- assisted delivery.

The most common risk factors amongst these were: pregnancy induced hypertension, meconium-stained liquor and urinary tract infection during pregnancy (Table/Fig 1). The parity of the patient was not considered in this study. None of the cases had any associated maternal or infant mortality.

When the authors compared the one minute APGAR of pregnant females with known risk factors and with no risk factors, they found that the APGAR was normal for almost all the infants that had no associated maternal or foetal risk factors, as compared to the group that had risk factors.

Most infants with associated risk factors had a 1 minute APGAR ranging between 5/10 and 8/10 with an APGAR of 6/10 in 8 cases, 7/10 in 7 cases, 5/10 in three cases and 8/10 in two cases (Table/Fig 2). The five minute APGAR score was also relatively low in cases with high-risk factors compared to the infants with no associated risk factors, 6/10 in two cases, 7/10 in six cases, 8/10 in eight cases and 9/10 in four cases (Table/Fig 3). Most of the infants with no risk factors had one minute APGAR of 8/10 with only three cases having an APGAR of six and seven out of 10 (Table/Fig 2).

On comparing the five minute APGAR between high and no-risk groups, low-risk infants had a better APGAR. The five minute APGAR of infants with associated risk factors was better than the one minute APGAR. Eight cases had an APGAR of 8/10, six cases had an APGAR of 7/10, four cases had a normal APGAR of 9/10 and only two cases had a persistently low APGAR of 6/10. The low/no risk group of infants had an overall higher APGAR of 9/10 and with only two cases with an APGAR of 8/10.

A pH of <7 was considered to be low in the present study. The infants with no risk factors had a higher pH of >7. These infants also had a better APGAR score. Amongst the high-risk group, the pH range was between 6 and 7.2 (Table/Fig 4). There was no association between the risk factors and the severity of acidic pH. The cord blood pH was also measured and compared between the high-risk and low-risk infants and was found to be significantly lower (acidic) and these infants also had a low one minute and five minute APGAR (Table/Fig 5).

The infants were followed-up and it was noted that 12 out of 20 infants with associated maternal and peri-natal risk factors required NICU admission and oxygen supplementation. Infants with no risk factors did not require NICU admission. None of the infants required Continued Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) or invasive modes of ventilation. All of the 40 infants were term and none of them had any congenital abnormalities.

The NLR which was found to be significantly increased in those cases with risk factors (Table/Fig 6), and a high NLR was especially seen in relation to pregnancy induced hypertension (Table/Fig 7).

Upon evaluating the haematological parameters, not many parameters were found significant (p-value of each parameter summarised in (Table/Fig 8)) except for the NLR. The descriptive statistics and the Levene’s test for equality of variances of all the parameters associated with and without risk-factors are tabulated in the table (Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

In this study involving 40 participants, a clear correlation was made between low cord blood pH, low APGAR scores in association with maternal and foetal risk factors. In addition, haematological parameters were assessed in all the 40 cases to evaluate the changes related to low pH, low APGAR and risk factors. In a study conducted by Kapaya H et al., acidemia of cord blood was defined as a pH <7.2 (1). In the present study, the cut-off pH value for an acidic pH was 7 (9). Placenta is responsible for maintaining acid-base balance in foetal life. The capacity of the placenta to maintain appropriate pH depends on various factors, including the maternal age at the time of conception, low maternal Hb levels and other factors. The umbilical cord acidemia is attributed to such factors that influence the optimal functioning of the placenta (9).

The acidic pH of the cord blood is due to the prolonged oxygen deprivation and the degree of acidemia is based on the severity of hypoxia. In a study done by Ahmadpour-Kacho M et al., correlated neo-natal asphyxia and risk factors. The most common risk factors in their study were meconium-stained liquor, breech presentation and it was found that the APGAR score of the high-risk group was lower than that of the group with no significant risk factors (10). In the present study, the most common risk factors were pregnancy induced hypertension, meconium-stained liquor and UTI during pregnancy.

Another study conducted by Meena P et al., included only asphyxiated infants of both normal vaginal delivery and caesarean sections whereas, in the present study, the authors made a comparison between the presence or absence of risk factors of infants born through normal vaginal delivery only. All of the infants required NICU admission after delivery in that study. They had similar results of the cord blood having an acidic pH which was associated with a low APGAR score in all the babies with birth asphyxia (11). In the present study, although none of the infants had asphyxia, some level of hypoxia must have been present due to foetal distress caused by maternal hypertension. Severe PIH can impede the blood supply and oxygen delivery to the brain of the developing foetus. Pregnancy induced hypertension can also elevate the chances of developing meconium aspiration syndrome. Other factors such as elevated blood sugars, maternal age of more than thirty are also established risk factors for the development of meconium aspiration syndrome which can cause foetal asphyxia (12).

A study conducted by Balachandran L et al., showed that the recurrent presence of urinary tract infections was associated with preterm delivery. However, in this study the APGAR score of infants or cord blood pH values were not correlated (13). A study conducted by Kapaya H et al., found strong association between UTI and acidemia of cord blood. Irrespective of the frequency, even if one episode of UTI can lower umbilical cord pH. They also found that the pH was much lower in emergency caesarean sections rather in elective Lower Section Caesarean Section (LSCS) or normal vaginal delivery, which is attributed to the increased period of foetal distress which brings about the decision of converting a vaginal delivery to a caesarean section (1).

In the present study, long-term follow-up of infants with low APGAR and low cord blood pH was not done and none of the infants developed Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy (HIE). In a study conducted by Malin GL et al., only 10% of the babies with HIE, which is a consequence of low pH of arterial cord blood, developed cerebral palsy later in life. The strength of association between HIE and cerebral palsy is controversial due to the presence of other factors such as low-birth weight, seizures etc., (14).

Although diabetes is very common in pregnancy, in this study, only one case has pregestational diabetes and had a very low APGAR and a pH of only 6.7. Gestational diabetes and APGAR had no correlation with each other, according to a study done by Yeagle KP et al., since only one case had pregestational diabetes in the present study, no correlation can be made between APGAR score and diabetes mellitus (5).

Based on the results obtained, some of the risk-factors such as PIH, UTI, advanced maternal age, increased BMI were associated with foetal hypoxia that was evident with cord blood acidemia, and a low APGAR score. Although none of the infants suffered severe hypoxic injury, some degree of hypoxia was present and with appropriate management with oxygen and close monitoring, there was no mortality associated with any of the cases. However, in this study, long term follow-up in order to assess the developmental milestones and the general well-being of the child was not done.

The NLR has been identified as one of the markers of inflammation which has been found to be elevated in cases of chronic inflammation, like coronary artery disease, renal abnormalities etc. It was also found to be a prognostic marker in terms of predicting severity of any inflammatory condition. In a study done by Okoye HC et al., NLR was found to be high in cases with pregnancy induced hypertension, which is concordant with the present study (15). All the cases with PIH in this study were associated with a low APGAR and cord blood acidemia as well.

The significance of this parameter is still pending for further analysis by future studies. NLR had no correlation with the other risk factors elaborated in the present study. Other haematological parameters such as RBC, platelet counts, MCV, MCH, MCHC, RDW, Reticulocyte count and nRBCs had no correlation with any of the parameters under investigation in this study.

Limitation(s)

Long-term follow-up of the infants was not possible and hence were not included in this study.

Conclusion

Assessing NLR with cord blood pH and APGAR scores could prove to be of utility in women with high-risk pregnancies and problematic deliveries, and can be added as routine investigations in postnatal assessment. These parameters can serve as combined or individual factors to assess foetal health in the immediate postpartum period, especially in the presence of risk factors.

References

1.
Kapaya H, Williams R, Elton G, Anumba D. Can obstetric risk factors predict fetal acidaemia at birth? A retrospective case-control study. J Pregnancy. 2018;2018:2195965. Doi: 10.1155/2018/2195965. eCollection 2018. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Velaphi S, Pattinson R. Avoidable factors and causes of neo-natal deaths from peri-natal asphyxia-hypoxia in South Africa: National peri-natal survey. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2007;27(2):99-106. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Cnattingius S, Johansson S, Razaz N. Apgar score and risk of neo-natal death among preterm infants. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;383(1):49-57. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
https://www.hopkinsallchildrens.org/Patients-Families/Health-Library/HealthDocNew/What-Is-the-Apgar-Score.
5.
Yeagle KP, O’brien JM, Curtin WM, Ural SH. Are gestational and type II diabetes mellitus associated with the apgar scores of full-term neonates? Int J Womens Health. 2018;10:603-07. Doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S170090. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Kintiraki E, Papakatsika S, Kotronis G, Goulis DG, Kotsis V. Pregnancy- Induced hypertension. Hormones (Athens). 2015;14(2):211-23. Doi: 10.14310/ horm.2002.1582. PMID: 26158653. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Cavazos-Rehg PA, Krauss MJ, Spitznagel EL, Bommarito K, Madden T, Olsen MA, et al. Maternal age and risk of labor and delivery complications. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19(6):1202-11. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Johansson S, Villamor E, Altman M, Bonamy AKE, Granath F, Cnattingius S. Maternal overweight and obesity in early pregnancy and risk of infant mortality: A population based cohort study in Sweden. BMJ (Online). 2014;349:g6572. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g6572 [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Mlodawska M, Mlodawski J, Gladys-Jakubczyk A, Pazera G. Relationship between Apgar score and umbilical cord blood acid-base balance in full-term and late preterm newborns born in medium and severe conditions. Ginekol Pol. 2022;93(1):57-62. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Ahmadpour-Kacho M, Asnafi N, Javadian M, Hajiahmadi M, Hosseini Taleghani N. Correlation between umbilical cord pH and Apgar score in high-risk pregnancy. 2010;20(4);401-06.
11.
Meena P, Meena M, Gunawat M. Correlation of APGAR score and cord blood pH with severity of birth asphyxia and short-term outcome. Int J Contemp Pediatrics. 2017;4(4):1325. [crossref]
12.
Li JY, Wang PH, Vitale SG, Chen SN, Marranzano M, Cianci A, et al. Pregnancy- induced hypertension is an independent risk factor for meconium aspiration syndrome: A retrospective population based cohort study. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;58(3):396-400. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Balachandran L, Jacob L, al Awadhi R, Yahya LO, Catroon KM, Soundararajan LP, et al. Urinary tract infection in pregnancy and its effects on maternal and peri-natal outcome: A retrospective study. Cureus. 2022;14(1):e21500. [crossref]
14.
Malin GL, Morris RK, Khan KS. Strength of association between umbilical cord pH and peri-natal and long term outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Online). 2010;340:1121. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1471. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Okoye HC, Madu AJ, Korubo K, Efobi C, Eze OE, Obodo O, et al. Correlates of neutrophil/lymphocyte, platelet/lymphocyte, and platelet/neutrophil ratios of neonates of women with hypertensive disease of pregnancy with neo-natal birth outcomes. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2019;38(2):105-10.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60987.18067

Date of Submission: Oct 21, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Dec 14, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Feb 10, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes (From mothers)
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 26, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 25, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 07, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 9

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com